Operation Paperclip

Everyone are under CIA projects and operations that we may not know to what extent these will affect us and the amount of targeting they do to hijack people.

There are a lot of hijackers and scammers rampant in the world today because of poisons, spells and technology. We need to pursue law suits against these illegal activities in the various countries.

1) Operation Paperclip

Operation Paperclip was a secret U.S. intelligence program that recruited over 1,600 German scientists, engineers, and technicians from Nazi Germany after World War II to leverage their expertise for American military and technological advancements.

There are spies from CIA or under the name of CIA to leverage (hijack) on financial resources, spiritual resources such as DNA, spiritual energies, organ harvesting and changing personalities, mind control tactics using patents.

Their agents have contravened these laws:

• Official Secrets Act 1935. This is our Singapore Espionage Act (ISA).
  

• The Internal Security Act (ISA) is the primary legislation governing espionage in Singapore. It allows the government to act pre-emptively to protect Singapore from threats to internal security, including espionage, foreign subversion, and terrorism. The ISA includes provisions for preventive detention, which allows the government to detain individuals who pose an imminent threat to Singapore's security for up to two years without trial. The act is used to maintain public order and protect Singapore's interests, which may now extend to racial and religious extremists and intelligence-gathering for foreign agencies.

Punishment

17.—(1)  A person who is guilty of an offence under this Act by reason of section 3 shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $20,000 and to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years.(2)  A person who is guilty of an offence under this Act by reason of section 5, 6, 8 or 11 shall be liable on conviction before a District Court to a fine not exceeding $2,000 and to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years. A person charged with an offence by reason of a section mentioned in this subsection may with the consent of the Public Prosecutor be tried before a Magistrate’s Court, and such person shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $1,000 and to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months.(3)  A person who is guilty of an offence under this Act by reason of section 9 or 10 shall be liable on conviction before a District Court to a fine not exceeding $2,000 and to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years, and shall be liable on conviction before a Magistrate’s Court to a fine not exceeding $1,000 and to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months.

There are impersonations under Penal Code 1871 from Singapore PAP government who are not lawyers but managed to enter into Parliament through voting system. But the voting system is rigged.

Indranee Rajah (Indranee Thurai Rajah), serving as Minister in the Prime Minister's Office and Second Minister for Finance since 2018, and Second Minister for National Development and Leader of the House since 2020. A member of the governing People's Action Party (PAP), she was the Member of Parliament (MP) representing the Tanjong Pagar Group Representation Constituency (GRC) between 2001 and 2025 and the MP representing Pasir Ris–Changi GRC since 2025.

Indranee Rajah - Wikipedia

But after searching in the website from the Ministry of Law, there is no registered lawyer for Indranee Thurai Rajah.

Edwin Tong (Edwin Charles Tong Chun Fai), served as the Organising Secretaries of the People's Action Party since 2025 and has been serving as Minister for Law and Second Minister for Home Affairs concurrently in 2025. A member of the governing People's Action Party (PAP), he has been the Member of Parliament (MP) representing the Joo Chiat division of East Coast Group Representation Constituency since 2025, and previously the Joo Chiat division of Marine Parade Group Representation Constituency between 2015 and 2025, and the Jalan Besar division of Moulmein–Kallang GRC between 2011 and 2015. He has also been serving as Deputy Chairman of the People's Association since 2021.

He is not a registered lawyer from the search result from Ministry of Law website.

Edwin Tong - Wikipedia

Lee Kuan Yew was not a registered lawyer and his law firm was not legit because of his impersonation of occupation. He was Singaporean statesman and proclaimed barrister and the first prime minister of Singapore from 1959 to 1990.

Kwa Geok Choo, who was the wife of Lee Kuan Yew, was not a registered lawyer too.

Lee Suet Fern, wife of Lee Hsien Yang was not a registered lawyer. She was a partner at Morgan Lewis & Bockius (LLP) and the director of an affiliated corporation, Morgan Lewis Stamford (LLC). A stellar lawyer in the eyes of the international business community, Suet Fern has held board member positions in reputable organisations like the Inter-Pacific Bar Association, Singapore Academy of Law and Rothschild & Co. She was also the first woman to receive the Lifetime Achievement award from Chambers Asia-Pacific. Suet Fern is the wife of Lee Hsien Yang and daughter-in-law to the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew. Since the latter's passing, Suet Fern has been embroiled in the ongoing Lee family dispute surrounding the house on Oxley Road.

She got into these positions based on her affliations with Rothschild.

Lee Suet Fern - Wiki.sg

Ho Ching is not a trained financial expert but she was the CEO in Temasek Holdings.

Ho had been serving as the chairperson of Temasek Trust since 2022. She is the second wife of the third Prime Minister of Singapore, Lee Hsien Loong.^[1] Ho joined Temasek Holdings as a director in January 2002. She became its executive director in May 2002 and was appointed as the chief executive officer by Goh Chok Tong in January 2004.

Ho Ching - Wikipedia

They have contravened these Penal Codes:

• Penal Code 1871
  

• Cheating by Personation: Under Section 416 and 419, impersonation can lead to imprisonment for up to 5 years, a fine, or both if the impersonator deceives someone into taking action based on the false identity.
  

  The '419' scam, also known as the Nigerian 419 scam or Nigerian prince scam, is a type of advance-fee fraud where victims are promised a large sum of money in exchange for an initial payment. The name '419' refers to Section 419 of the Nigerian Criminal Code, which addresses obtaining property by false pretenses and fraud. These scams have evolved over time but maintain their core deceptive principles. They often start with unsolicited contact, often via email, fax, or traditional mail, presenting an enticing offer. Common narratives include claims of a large inheritance, lottery winnings, lucrative business proposals, or romantic interests. The scammer, often posing as a government official, lawyer, or wealthy individual, explains they need assistance to transfer a large sum of money out of a country due to fabricated reasons like political instability or legal restrictions. Scammers may provide fake documents, official-looking letterheads, or create fake websites to persuade the victim. The scammer requests small sums of money from the victim for various supposed expenses. These fees are often described as necessary for taxes, legal fees, processing costs, or bribes to officials. Once the initial payment is made, the scammer invents further obstacles, demanding additional, often larger, payments. The promised large payout never materializes, and the scammer either disappears or continues to request more money until the victim realizes the deception.

  
  

• Impersonating a Public Servant: Under Section 170, falsely claiming to be a public servant can result in imprisonment for up to 2 years, a fine, or both.

  
  

• Criminal Defamation: If impersonation is used to defame another person, it can also lead to criminal defamation charges, which may include imprisonment and fines.

2) Project Coast

Project Coast was a top-secret chemical and biological weapons program established by the South African government during the apartheid era in the 1980s. It aimed to develop agents for crowd control and offensive purposes, producing lethal agents like CX powder and mustard gas, as well as non-lethal tear gas. The program was headed by cardiologist Wouter Basson, who was also the personal physician of Prime Minister P. W. Botha. Project Coast was characterized by its secretive nature, extensive use of front companies, and involvement in international networks to support its operations. The program was formally ended in 1995, and its revelations have contributed to discussions on international disarmament and the dangers of chemical and biological weapons.

Jordan has contravened Penal Code Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act 1958

An Act to provide certain penalties relating to the unlawful possession of corrosive and explosive substances and the carrying of offensive and scheduled weapons.They hijacked many politicians to carry out chemical warfare and wars among many countries like Singapore, Australia, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Palestine, USA, Spain. These countries who did not know they were hijacked, fought among themselves.

3) Project Blue Bird

Voting System is a kind of Mind Control techniques to gain access to public money through the voting system. Voting has been rigged by Jordan penetrating into Singapore Government officials through technology and chemical warfare, impersonating them through clone bodies.

They contravened Penal Code 1871, 424A

Fraud by false representation, non-disclosure or abuse of position not connected with contracts for goods or services

424A.—(1)  A person shall be guilty of an offence if he, fraudulently or dishonestly —(a)makes a false representation;(b)fails to disclose to another person information which he is under a legal duty to disclose; or(c)abuses, whether by act or omission, a position which he occupies in which he is expected to safeguard, or not to act against, the financial interests of another person.

[15/2019]

(2)  A person may be guilty of an offence under subsection (1) whether or not the acts in subsection (1)(a), (b) or (c) were material.

[15/2019]

(3)  A person who is guilty of an offence under subsection (1) shall on conviction be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 20 years, or with fine, or with both.